|
Marc R. Blackman, MD; John D. Sorkin, MD, PhD; Thomas Münzer,
MD; Michele F. Bellantoni, MD; Jan Busby-Whitehead, MD; Thomas E. Stevens,
MD; Jocelyn Jayme, MD; Kieran G. O'Connor, MD; Colleen Christmas, MD;
Jordan D. Tobin, MD; Kerry J. Stewart, EdD; Ernest Cottrell, BS; Carol
St. Clair, MS; Katharine M. Pabst, CRNP, MPH; S. Mitchell Harman, MD,
PhD
JAMA. 2002;288:2282-2292.
ABSTRACT
Context Hormone administration to elderly individuals
can increase lean body mass (LBM) and decrease fat, but interactive effects
of growth hormone (GH) and sex steroids and their influence on strength
and endurance are unknown.
Objective To evaluate the effects of recombinant human
GH and/or sex steroids on body composition, strength, endurance, and adverse
outcomes in aged persons.
Design, Setting, and Participants A 26-week randomized,
double-blind, placebo-controlled parallel-group trial in healthy, ambulatory,
community-dwelling US women (n = 57) and men (n = 74) aged 65 to 88 years
recruited between June 1992 and July 1998.
Interventions Participants were randomized to receive
GH (starting dose, 30 µg/kg, reduced to 20 µg/kg, subcutaneously
3 times/wk) + sex steroids (women: transdermal estradiol, 100 µg/d,
plus oral medroxyprogesterone acetate, 10 mg/d, during the last 10 days
of each 28-day cycle [HRT]; men: testosterone enanthate, biweekly intramuscular
injections of 100 mg) (n = 35); GH + placebo sex steroid (n = 30); sex
steroid + placebo GH (n = 35); or placebo GH + placebo sex steroid (n
= 31) in a 2 x 2 factorial design.
Main Outcome Measures Lean body mass, fat mass, muscle
strength, maximum oxygen uptake (O2max) during treadmill test, and adverse
effects.
Results In women, LBM increased by 0.4 kg with placebo,
1.2 kg with HRT (P = .09), 1.0 kg with GH (P = .001), and 2.1 kg with
GH + HRT (P<.001). Fat mass decreased significantly in the GH and GH
+ HRT groups. In men, LBM increased by 0.1 kg with placebo, 1.4 kg with
testosterone (P = .06), 3.1 kg with GH (P<.001), and 4.3 kg with GH
+ testosterone (P<.001). Fat mass decreased significantly with GH and
GH + testosterone. Women's strength decreased in the placebo group and
increased nonsignificantly with HRT (P = .09), GH (P = .29), and GH +
HRT (P = .14). Men's strength also did not increase significantly except
for a marginally significant increase of 13.5 kg with GH + testosterone
(P = .05). Women's O2max declined by 0.4 mL/min/kg in the placebo and
HRT groups but increased with GH (P = .07) and GH + HRT (P = .06). Men's
O2max declined by 1.2 mL/min/kg with placebo and by 0.4 mL/min/kg with
testosterone (P = .49) but increased with GH (P = .11) and with GH + testosterone
(P<.001). Changes in strength (r = 0.355; P<.001) and in O2max (r
= 0.320; P = .002) were directly related to changes in LBM. Edema was
significantly more common in women taking GH (39% vs 0%) and GH + HRT
(38% vs 0%). Carpal tunnel symptoms were more common in men taking GH
+ testosterone (32% vs 0%) and arthralgias were more common in men taking
GH (41% vs 0%). Diabetes or glucose intolerance occurred in 18 GH-treated
men vs 7 not receiving GH (P = .006).
Conclusions In this study, GH with or without sex
steroids in healthy, aged women and men increased LBM and decreased fat
mass. Sex steroid + GH increased muscle strength marginally and O2max
in men, but women had no significant change in strength or cardiovascular
endurance. Because adverse effects were frequent (importantly, diabetes
and glucose intolerance), GH interventions in the elderly should be confined
to controlled studies.
|